Adams, Jean; Gareth, Morgan (2007)
"Second Generation" E-Learning: Characteristics and Design Principles for Supporting Management Soft-Skills Development
International Journal on E-Learning, April
Review by: Seufert, Sabine (2008-01-04)
The purpose of the article is to develop the concept of "second generation" e-learning as a new paradigm for designing online learning environments. The authors argue that an absolutely new thinking about online learning compared to"first generation e-learning"is necessary and that is the reason why they called their research project "NewMindsets".
The research method represents an action learning methodology and evolved through the stages: 1) conceptuali-zation, 2) rapid prototyping, 3) pilot implementation and 4) continuing refinenment and consolidation.
The results of the research is at first the distinction between "first" and "second generation" E-Learning:
- "First Generation" E-Learning is ideal for:technical skill development,routinized learning for tasks where conformance is needed, e. g. following a safety procedure, installing a piece of software procedures where deviation can be illegal or lethal, memory based learning/preparing to pass information-based tests.
- "Second Generation" E-Learning is ideal for:soft-skill developmentpersonal, reflective learning, e. g., to do one's job more effectively, engage in critical thinking, cope with ambigu-ity, leadership development,innovation and performance-based learning, addressing complex issues
The authors further explained 6 key characteristics and design principles of "Second Generation e-Learning" as a further research outcome:
- Technology-driven versus pedagogy driven e-learningIt sounds simple but it seems to be a major issue in the e-learning field. The "second generation e-learning" strives to create the potential for learning to become an inherently self-organisating process. Within the context of soft-skills development, it emphasizes on the need to consider the most important pedagogical drivers:- Learning styles: second generation systems can support a variety of learning preferences by tapping the nonlin-ear open-endedness of the web medium- Context-based learning: encouraging learners to exercise their abilities to judge the relevance of what they are learning- The importance of informal learning: advancing context-specific, unplanned, just-in-time performance-based learning- The importance of provoking new insights to open up possibilities: second generation approaches use provoca-tion-based content as opposed to purely instructional content to invite and engage learning by opening up think-ing and enabling learners to decide for themselves what actions are most appropriate in their own situation.- The need for accelerated learning and performance improvement: Since time resources are always a constraint "second generation" approaches try to solve it by giving learnes the control of their own learning.
- A linear-sequential logic with the instructor-in-control versus learner-in-control: The "second generation" puts emphasis on learner-in-control pedagogy understood as a highly learner-centered approach which is particulary relevant for developing soft skills where context-specific solutions requiring man-agement judgement.
- Evaluation based on repetitive practice and passing test versus self-assessment, reflective practice, and suc-cessful application in second generation approaches.
- Engagement through visual animation versus engagement through provocation: content-based provocations generate deeply engaging learning that can provoke new insights and stimulate new knowledge sharing. The overall aim is to create "space" for learners to get involved.
- Separation of theory and practice versus integration of theory and practice in real-time by using work issues, or other potential applications, supporting action learning as opposed to just conceptual learning.
- Separate systems for learning and knowledge capture and dissemination versus integrated learning, knowledge creation, and knowledge sharing.
Overall, the research findings provide a convincing set of design principles for "second generation" e-learning approaches. However, their descriptions are based on a very abstract level what hinders the transfer to practice. The demonstration of examples might have been helpful.